Taboos as Drivers for Counterculture: Normalizing Misogyny in Incel Communities and Beyond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we explore how taboos act as drivers for reproducing countercultures. We define taboo utterances as those that either constitute socially prohibited acts (e.g., slurs), express elements of a prohibited ideology (e.g., claims advocating the subjugation of women), or promote socially prohibited actions (e.g., violence against women). We show how in certain communities, taboo utterances are not only tolerated but become highly rewarded in that they function as mechanisms of resistance and identity formation. We examine this dynamic in incel communities (involuntary celibates) as a case-study. We show how by embracing taboos, incels not only signal their rejection of mainstream norms and values, but primarily seek to forge a shared ideology and a group identity. This requires an explanation of how and why taboos can be repurposed to gain value within incel counterculture. We propose that one such explanation is the driver for social status. We argue that exploiting taboos becomes a currency of status for incels: they gain acceptance and approval within the community, and this in turn creates an arms race to become more and more transgressive and extreme. We explain this via the creation of ideological roles that serve to justify and rationalise overt extreme misogyny. We conclude with brief ethical considerations about normalizing misogyny in incel communities and spilling over into mainstream culture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Social Philosophy
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Counterculture
  • Ideological Roles
  • Ideology
  • Incels
  • Masculine Hegemony
  • Normalizing Misogyny
  • Social Roles
  • Status
  • Taboo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taboos as Drivers for Counterculture: Normalizing Misogyny in Incel Communities and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this