Teaching and learning evidence-based medicine: Cross-sectional survey investigating knowledge and attitudes of teachers and learners in primary and secondary care

A. Niroshan Siriwardena, John Sandars, Islay Gemmell, Aly Rashid

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an important component of quality healthcare and a key part of the curriculum for doctors in training. There have been no previous studies comparing attitudes and knowledge of doctors in primary and secondary care towards EBM practice and teaching and this study sets out to investigate this area. We asked participants, a stratified sample of general practitioners, hospital consultants, GP registrars and junior hospital doctors in Leicester, Northamptonshire and Rutland, UK, to complete a self-administered survey questionnaire and written knowledge test which provided 'positive to evidence-based practice' (PEP) attitude scores and Manchester Short EBM Questionnaire (MANSEBMQ) knowledge scores of participants. The response rate was low which may have led to volunteer bias but there were sufficient responses to explore attitude scores and knowledge scores. Attitude (PEP) scores were highest in hospital consultants, intermediate in doctors in training and lowest in general practitioner (GP) respondents (mean score 71.7 vs 70.5 vs 67.2; P = 0.006). PEP scores were also highest in respondents with higher degrees (MD, PhD, MSc), intermediate in those with higher professional qualifications (MRCP, FRCS, MRCGP or equivalent) and lowest in those with none of these (mean score 72.9 vs 70.6 vs 67.2; P = 0.005). PEP scores were significantly higher (P = 0.002) in respondents who taught EBM (mean score 71.7, 95% CI 70.3 to 73.2, n = 109, missing = 5) compared with those who did not (mean score 68.6, 95% CI 67.3 to 69.9, n = 105, missing = 12) and in respondents with research experience (P <0.001), research training (P <0.001) and training in EBM (P = 0.001). There was a positive correlation between PEP score and MANSEBMQ score (P = 0.013). In contrast, and paradoxically opposite to the pattern of attitudes, knowledge scores were highest in GPs, intermediate in junior hospital doctors and lowest in consultant respondents (mean score 63.5 vs 61.9 vs 54.5, P = 0.005). Although GPs and GP trainers were significantly less positive in attitude to EBM compared to GP registrars, junior hospital doctors and consultant respondents, they had significantly higher knowledge scores. This study demonstrated that the attitude (PEP) score and knowledge questionnaire (MANSEBMQ) have good reliability but require further research to demonstrate validity. © 2007 Radcliffe Publishing Limited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-57
    Number of pages12
    JournalEducation for Primary Care
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

    Keywords

    • Attitudes
    • Evidence-based practice
    • General practice registrars
    • General practitioners
    • Hospital doctors
    • Primary care
    • Secondary care

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching and learning evidence-based medicine: Cross-sectional survey investigating knowledge and attitudes of teachers and learners in primary and secondary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this