Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Technological self-reliance in Brazil: Achievements and prospects-Some evidence from the non-serial capital goods sector

  • Edmund Amann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the course of the 1990s, the Brazilian economy has undergone an unprecedented programme of liberalization. Barriers to trade have been lowered, the scope of industrial policy has narrowed and the state has radically scaled down its role as producer, following the launch of an ambitious privatization programme. This article traces the impact of these developments on the technological behaviour of one crucial industrial sector: the non-serial capital goods sector. While economic liberalization appears to have had a favourable effect upon technological dynamism in the field of process innovation, the same cannot be said of product innovation. Following the onset of liberalization, the intensified pursuit of short-run cost efficiency served only to reinforce long-established conservative product innovation strategies. In the main, these have emphasized the foreign rather than domestic sourcing of technology. Such strategies, it is argued, are currently preventing the sector from realizing its full potential as a generator and diffuser of industrial technology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-357
Number of pages28
JournalOxford Development Studies
Volume27
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technological self-reliance in Brazil: Achievements and prospects-Some evidence from the non-serial capital goods sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this