Ten warning signs of primary immunodeficiency: A new paradigm is needed for the 21st century

Peter D. Arkwright, Andrew R. Gennery

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The 10 warning signs of primary immunodeficiency are being promoted as a screening tool for use by both the general public and physicians. A recent study, however, shows that except for family history, need for intravenous antibiotics and failure to thrive, the 10 warning signs are not a useful screen of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). Over the last few decades, there has been a revolution in our understanding of PID. The 10 warning signs do not take into account the fact that PIDs now include diseases that present with sporadic infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, and malignancy. This review focuses on the advances in our understanding of PID, the current limitations of the 10 warning signs, and recommendations to ensure that patients with PID are diagnosed in a timely fashion in the future. © 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)7-14
    Number of pages7
    JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
    Volume1238
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

    Keywords

    • Atopic dermatitis
    • Autoimmunity
    • Cancer
    • Family history
    • Primary immunodeficiency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ten warning signs of primary immunodeficiency: A new paradigm is needed for the 21st century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this