Ten year follow up of ulcerative colitis patients with and without low grade dysplasia

C. H. Lim, M. F. Dixon, A. Vail, D. Forman, D. A F Lynch, A. T R Axon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background and aims: Low grade dysplasia (LGD) is believed to predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC), and proctocolectomy has been advocated when this is identified. Between 1978 and 1990, 160 patients with longstanding extensive ulcerative colitis (UC) were recruited for annual colonoscopic surveillance and 40 developed LGD at some stage. We report the outcome of this cohort 10 years after the original study ended. Methods: Retrospective cohort study and histopathological review of the original diagnoses of LGD. The outcome of 158/160 (98.8%) patients was established in 2000. Results: Of the 128 patients still alive and with an intact colon at the end of 1990, two were not traceable, 29 had LGD, and 97 had no dysplasia (controls). After 10 years, high grade dysplasia (HGD) or CRC developed in 3/29 LGD (10%) and in 4/97 controls (4.0%). Kaplan-Meier analysis from 1991 to death or colectomy did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (log rank test p=0.63). Histopathological review demonstrated the unreliability of LGD diagnosis. Agreement between pathologists was uniformly poor: kappa
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1127-1132
    Number of pages5
    JournalGut
    Volume52
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2003

    Keywords

    • Adult
    • Aged
    • Cohort Studies
    • statistics & numerical data: Colectomy
    • complications: Colitis, Ulcerative
    • complications: Colorectal Neoplasms
    • Female
    • Follow-Up Studies
    • Humans
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Prognosis
    • Retrospective Studies
    • Survival Analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ten year follow up of ulcerative colitis patients with and without low grade dysplasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this