Testing models of media performance in Wartime: U.K. tv news and the 2003 invasion of Iraq

Piers Robinson, Peter Goddard, Katy Parry, Craig Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Debate over media coverage of foreign affairs has been dominated by a range of theoretical positions, here characterized as the 'elite-driven,' 'independent' and 'oppositional' models. In this article, we explore the relative cogency of these theoretical positions in the context of British media coverage of the 2003 Iraq War. We find that coverage generally conformed to the elite-driven model, reinforcing the coalition. Nevertheless, our analysis also provides evidence to support the independent and oppositional models. Regarding casualties and the humanitarian situation, we find significant levels of coverage which support the oppositional model and the notion of event-driven news. Overall, our study points toward a more nuanced understanding of media-state relations than is suggested by the existing elite-driven paradigm. © 2009 International Communication Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-563
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing models of media performance in Wartime: U.K. tv news and the 2003 invasion of Iraq'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this