Texture evolution of zircaloy-2 during beta-quenching: Effect of process variables

Javier Romero, Michael Preuss, Joao Quinta Da Fonseca, Robert J. Comstock, Mats Dahlbäck, Lars Hallstadius

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The nuclear industry is interested in developing thermomechanical processes to produce random crystallographic orientation (texture) from cold-rolled Zircaloy-2 sheets used to manufacture boiling water reactor (BWR) channels. Randomized textures are beneficial because they minimize anisotropic irradiation-assisted growth, which in turn reduces bowing and uncontrolled deformation of BWR channels during service. The texture evolution of cold-rolled Zircaloy-2 sheets during the allotropic α→β→α phase transformation was characterized by using synchrotron X-ray diffraction in situ and electron backscatter diffraction. The initial strong rolling texture is weakened only if the α→β→α phase transformation is complete. Plastic deformation and grain growth in the β-phase lead to changes in the β texture and modify the inherited α texture. The global texture evolution is not sensitive to levels of stress that do not cause β plastic deformation. These findings demonstrate that accurate temperature control of the β-quenching process is of utmost importance in order to minimize undesirable irradiation growth of BWR channels during service, and that plastic deformation in the β phase can be employed to modify the inherited α texture. BWR channels with β-quenched textures will exhibit minimum irradiation growth caused by texture. Copyright © 2010 by ASTM International.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of ASTM International
    Volume7
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

    Keywords

    • Beta-quenching
    • Synchrotron X-ray diffraction
    • Texture
    • Variant selection
    • Zircaloy-2

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Texture evolution of zircaloy-2 during beta-quenching: Effect of process variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this