The 36th meeting of the pay and conditions committee of the union of philosophers, sages and other luminaries (UK university branch) or doping and proportionality

Søren Holm*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of current anti-doping practices through considerations of the ethical issues raised by the World Academic Standards Agency's proposal for an Academic Passport. It specifically analyses whether the modern anti-doping regime exhibits proportionality, whether it infringes privacy in relation to secondary research use of data and samples and whether it perpetuates a problematic notion of 'thought crime'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-233
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Keywords

  • Doping
  • Proportionality
  • Secondary use of data and samples
  • Thought crime

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 36th meeting of the pay and conditions committee of the union of philosophers, sages and other luminaries (UK university branch) or doping and proportionality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this