Abstract
This article presents an analysis of current anti-doping practices through considerations of the ethical issues raised by the World Academic Standards Agency's proposal for an Academic Passport. It specifically analyses whether the modern anti-doping regime exhibits proportionality, whether it infringes privacy in relation to secondary research use of data and samples and whether it perpetuates a problematic notion of 'thought crime'.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 225-233 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2011 |
Keywords
- Doping
- Proportionality
- Secondary use of data and samples
- Thought crime