Abstract
This article presents an analysis of current anti-doping practices through considerations of the ethical issues raised by the World Academic Standards Agency's proposal for an Academic Passport. It specifically analyses whether the modern anti-doping regime exhibits proportionality, whether it infringes privacy in relation to secondary research use of data and samples and whether it perpetuates a problematic notion of 'thought crime'.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-233 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2011 |
Keywords
- Doping
- Proportionality
- Secondary use of data and samples
- Thought crime