The adnexal mass: benign or malignant? Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index

Ann Prys Davies, Ian Jacobs, Robert Woolas, Andrew Fish, David Oram

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective To validate a risk of malignancy index incorporating menopausal status, serum CA 125 level and pelvic ultrasound features in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Design A retrospective observational study. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital. Subjects One hundred and twenty-four women admitted consecutively to the gynaecology department for surgical exploration of an adnexal mass. Main outcome measures The sensitivities and specificities of menopausal status, serum CA 125 level and ultrasound features, in isolation and combined (the risk of malignancy index (RMI)), for diagnosing ovarian cancer. Results Tested on a new population of women, the RMI retained the high sensitivity for diagnosing ovarian cancer seen in the original report describing its derivation. The specificity, however, was lower. The study confirmed that the RMI is more accurate than the individual criteria in diagnosing ovarian cancer, and was comparable with other scoring systems. Conclusions The risk of malignancy index is a simple scoring system for ovarian cancer. Application of the risk of malignancy index in clinical practice may provide a rational basis for specialist referral of patients with ovarian cancer before diagnostic surgery. © 1993.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)927-931
    Number of pages4
    JournalBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    Volume100
    Issue number10
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 1993

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The adnexal mass: benign or malignant? Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this