The adverse selection effect of corporate cash reserve: Evidence from acquisitions solely financed by stock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

227 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Corporate cash reserve has an adverse selection effect. Specifically, if investors know a company does not have to issue to invest, an attempt to do so sends a strong signal of overvaluation. This notion has not been explicitly studied in the extant empirical literature, despite its intuitiveness. Using a sample of acquisitions solely financed by stock to exclude the potential complications of free cash flow, I find that announcement returns are lower for a bidder with a higher excess cash reserve. This effect is stronger in hot equity market years or when a bidder's standalone value is more difficult to evaluate. I also find evidence supporting the idea that targets request cash payment to remove "lemon" bidders in normal (non-hot equity market) years, but accept too many stock offers in hot equity market years. After acquisitions, high-excess-cash-reserve bidders operationally outperform low-excess-cash-reserve bidders. Further, they spend more funds on reducing debt but not more on investments, compared with low-excess-cash-reserve bidders. Combined, these results show that cash reserve has information costs. Further, they highlight the importance of the two-sided information asymmetry framework of Rhodes-Kropf and Viswanathan (2004) in describing merger outcomes without resorting to behavioral or agency explanations. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-808
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Adverse selection effect of corporate cash reserve
  • Excess cash reserve
  • Overvaluation
  • Synergy
  • Two-sided information asymmetry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The adverse selection effect of corporate cash reserve: Evidence from acquisitions solely financed by stock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this