TY - JOUR
T1 - The association between different cognitive domains and age in a multi-centre study of middle-aged and older European men
AU - Tajar, Abdelouahid
AU - Ulubaev, Aslan
AU - Pendleton, Neil
AU - O'Connor, Daryl B.
AU - Bartfai, Gyorgy
AU - Boonen, Steven
AU - Forti, Gianni
AU - Giwercman, Aleksander
AU - Han, Thang S.
AU - Kula, Krzysztof
AU - Lean, Michael E J
AU - Punab, Margus
AU - Vanderschueren, Dirk
AU - Petrone, Luisa
AU - Cilotti, Antonio
AU - Borghs, Herman
AU - Slowikowska-Hilczer, Jolanta
AU - Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Renata
AU - Huhtaniemi, Ilpo
AU - Wu, Frederick
AU - Silman, Alan
AU - O'Neill, Terence
AU - Finn, Joseph
AU - Steer, Philip
AU - Lee, David
AU - Pye, Stephen
AU - Casanueva, Felipe
AU - Lage, Mary
AU - Földesi, Imre
AU - Fejes, Imre
AU - Korrovitz, Paul
AU - Jiang, Min
N1 - and the EMAS study groupThe EMAS Study Group: Florence (Gianni Forti, Luisa Petrone, Antonio Cilotti); Leuven (Dirk Vanderschueren, Steven Boonen, Herman Borghs); Lodz (Krzysztof Kula, Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer, Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska); London (Ilpo Huhtaniemi); Malmo (Aleksander Giwercman); Manchester (Frederick Wu, Alan Silman, Neil Pendleton, Terence O'Neill, Joseph Finn, Philip Steer, Abdelouahid Tajar, David Lee, Stephen Pye); Santiago (Felipe Casanueva, Mary Lage); Szeged (Gyorgy Bartfai, Imre Foldesi, Imre Fejes); Tartu (Margus Punab, Paul Korrovitz); Turku (Min Jiang). Journal article
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - Objectives: We determined levels of cognitive functioning in community dwelling men aged 40-79 (n=3265) from eight European centres and investigated to what extent cognitive performance varied between centres, the association between different cognitive domains and age, educational level, co-morbidity and lifestyle factors and the respective contributions of centre and individual factors to cognitive performance. Methods: Cognitive domains assessed were visuo-constructional ability and visual memory (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, ROCF), topographical memory (Camden Topographical Recognition Memory test, CTRM) and processing speed (Digit-Symbol Substitution test, DSST). Results: There were significant between-centre differences in all four cognitive test scores. Using multilevel linear regression analysis (MLRA), age, education, depression, physical performance and smoking were independent predictors of cognitive function and these variables explained 10-13% of the variation in cognitive scores between centres and 17-36% of the variation in scores between individuals within centres. Conclusion: Our data suggest that although a proportion of the variance in cognitive function among European men is explained by individual level differences, a significant proportion is due to contextual phenomenon. Such contextual factors need to be considered when analysing multi-centre data and European men should not be treated as homogeneous when assessing cognitive performance using existing instruments. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AB - Objectives: We determined levels of cognitive functioning in community dwelling men aged 40-79 (n=3265) from eight European centres and investigated to what extent cognitive performance varied between centres, the association between different cognitive domains and age, educational level, co-morbidity and lifestyle factors and the respective contributions of centre and individual factors to cognitive performance. Methods: Cognitive domains assessed were visuo-constructional ability and visual memory (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, ROCF), topographical memory (Camden Topographical Recognition Memory test, CTRM) and processing speed (Digit-Symbol Substitution test, DSST). Results: There were significant between-centre differences in all four cognitive test scores. Using multilevel linear regression analysis (MLRA), age, education, depression, physical performance and smoking were independent predictors of cognitive function and these variables explained 10-13% of the variation in cognitive scores between centres and 17-36% of the variation in scores between individuals within centres. Conclusion: Our data suggest that although a proportion of the variance in cognitive function among European men is explained by individual level differences, a significant proportion is due to contextual phenomenon. Such contextual factors need to be considered when analysing multi-centre data and European men should not be treated as homogeneous when assessing cognitive performance using existing instruments. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KW - Ageing
KW - Cognitive function
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Male health
KW - Multilevel analysis
KW - Population survey
U2 - 10.1002/gps.2255
DO - 10.1002/gps.2255
M3 - Article
SN - 0885-6230
VL - 24
SP - 1257
EP - 1266
JO - International journal of geriatric psychiatry
JF - International journal of geriatric psychiatry
IS - 11
ER -