TY - JOUR
T1 - The benefits of international volunteering in a low-resource setting: development of a core outcome set
AU - Tyler, Natasha
AU - Chatwin, John
AU - Byrne, Ged
AU - Hart, Joanne
AU - Byrne-Davis, Lucie
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Anya Ahmed, Louise Ackers, Natalie Tate, Eileen Cunningham, Hassan Osman and James Ackers-Johnson for being involved in the project and helping with the piloting of the Delphi. We would like to thank all of the stakeholders involved in the Delphi for their significant contribution of time and effort. The full title of the study from which this analysis was derived was Measuring the outcomes of volunteering for education (MOVE). The study was funded by Health Education England (Global Health Exchange). The research team was independent from the funding agency. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Health Education England or the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a project development grant from Health Education England (HEE), through the Global Health Exchange (GHE), grant ref. NURA54.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/20
Y1 - 2018/12/20
N2 - Qualitative narrative analysis and case studies form the majority of the current peer-reviewed literature about the benefits of professional volunteering or international placements for healthcare professionals. These often describe generalised outcomes that are difficult to define or have multiple meanings (such as ‘communication skills’ or ‘leadership’) and are therefore difficult to measure. However, there is an interest from employers, professional groups and individual volunteers in generating metrics for monitoring personal and professional development of volunteers and comparing different volunteering experiences in terms of their impact on the volunteers. In this paper, we describe two studies in which we (a) consolidated qualitative research and individual accounts into a core outcome set and (b) tested the core outcome set in a large group of global health stakeholders. We conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of literature to extract outcomes of international placements and variables that may affect these outcomes. We presented these outcomes to 58 stakeholders in global health, employing a Delphi method to reach consensus about which were ‘core’ and which were likely to be developed through international volunteering. The systematic review of 55 papers generated 133 unique outcomes and 34 potential variables. One hundred fifty-six statements were then presented to the Delphi stakeholders, of which they agreed 116 were core to a wide variety of healthcare professional practice and likely to be developed through international experiences. The core outcomes (COs) were both negative and positive and included skills, knowledge, attitudes and outcomes for healthcare organisations. We summarised existing literature and stakeholder opinion into a core outcome set of 116 items that are core to healthcare professional practice and likely to be developed through international experiences. We identified, in the literature, a set of variables that could affect learning outcomes. The core outcome set will be used in a future study to develop a psychometric assessment tool.
AB - Qualitative narrative analysis and case studies form the majority of the current peer-reviewed literature about the benefits of professional volunteering or international placements for healthcare professionals. These often describe generalised outcomes that are difficult to define or have multiple meanings (such as ‘communication skills’ or ‘leadership’) and are therefore difficult to measure. However, there is an interest from employers, professional groups and individual volunteers in generating metrics for monitoring personal and professional development of volunteers and comparing different volunteering experiences in terms of their impact on the volunteers. In this paper, we describe two studies in which we (a) consolidated qualitative research and individual accounts into a core outcome set and (b) tested the core outcome set in a large group of global health stakeholders. We conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of literature to extract outcomes of international placements and variables that may affect these outcomes. We presented these outcomes to 58 stakeholders in global health, employing a Delphi method to reach consensus about which were ‘core’ and which were likely to be developed through international volunteering. The systematic review of 55 papers generated 133 unique outcomes and 34 potential variables. One hundred fifty-six statements were then presented to the Delphi stakeholders, of which they agreed 116 were core to a wide variety of healthcare professional practice and likely to be developed through international experiences. The core outcomes (COs) were both negative and positive and included skills, knowledge, attitudes and outcomes for healthcare organisations. We summarised existing literature and stakeholder opinion into a core outcome set of 116 items that are core to healthcare professional practice and likely to be developed through international experiences. We identified, in the literature, a set of variables that could affect learning outcomes. The core outcome set will be used in a future study to develop a psychometric assessment tool.
KW - Core outcomes
KW - Delphi
KW - Health professional education
KW - International placements
KW - International volunteering
KW - Systematic review
KW - Professional Competence
KW - Humans
KW - Education, Professional
KW - Consensus
KW - Learning
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - Developed Countries
KW - Delivery of Health Care
KW - Internationality
KW - Health Personnel
KW - Organizations
KW - Developing Countries
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Health Resources
KW - Volunteers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058899837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/benefits-international-volunteering-lowresource-setting-development-core-outcome-set-1
U2 - 10.1186/s12960-018-0333-5
DO - 10.1186/s12960-018-0333-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 30567549
SN - 1478-4491
VL - 16
SP - 69
JO - Human Resources for Health
JF - Human Resources for Health
IS - 1
M1 - 69
ER -