The British occupational cancer burden study

L Rushton, S Bagga, R Bevan, T Brown, J Cherrie, P Holmes, L Fortunato, R Slack, M Van Tongeren, C Young, S Hutchings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Prioritising control of occupationally-related cancers should be evidence based. We have estimated the current burden of cancer in Great Britain attributable to occupation for IARC group 1 and 2A carcinogens. Methods We calculated attributable fractions and numbers for mortality/incidence using risk estimates from published literature and national data sources to estimate proportions exposed. Results Cancer deaths attributable to occupation in 2005 are 5.3% (8023) (men: 8.2% (6366); women 2.3% (1657)). Attributable incidence estimates are 13694 (4.0%) cancer registrations (men: 10074 (5.7%); women 3620 (2.1%)). Occupational attributable fractions are over 2% for mesothelioma, sinonasal lung, nasopharynx, breast, non-melanoma skin, bladder oesophagus, soft tissue sarcoma and stomach cancers. Asbestos, shift work, mineral oils, solar radiation, silica, diesel engine exhaust, coal tars and pitches, occupation as a painter or welder, dioxins, environmental tobacco smoke, radon, tetrachloroethylene arsenic and strong inorganic mists each contribute 100+ registrations. Industries/occupations with over 200 cancer registrations include construction, women's shift work, metal working, personal/household services, mining land transport, printing/publishing, retail/hotels/restaurants public administration/defence, farming and several manufacturing sectors. Conclusions This study is the first detailed cancer burden study using all IARC 1 and 2A carcinogens and quantifying the contribution of individual industry sectors. Our methodology provides a basis for adaptation for use in other countries and global occupational burden estimation and for extension to include social and economic impact evaluation.. The results highlight specific carcinogenic agents and the occupational circumstances and industrial areas where exposures to these agents occurs facilitating prioritisation of risk reduction strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOccupational and Environmental Medicine
Place of PublicationL. Rushton, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
PublisherBMJ
PagesA58
Volume51
Edition1
ISBN (Print)1351-0711
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameOccupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume68

Keywords

  • United Kingdom
  • adaptation
  • agricultural worker
  • arsenic
  • asbestos
  • bladder
  • breast
  • cancer mortality
  • cancer registry
  • carcinogen
  • coal tar
  • diesel engine
  • dioxin
  • epidemiology
  • esophagus
  • evidence based practice
  • exposure
  • female
  • human
  • industrial area
  • industry
  • lung
  • male
  • melanoma
  • mesothelioma
  • metal
  • methodology
  • mineral oil
  • nasopharynx
  • neoplasm
  • occupation
  • occupational cancer
  • occupational health
  • painter
  • radon
  • registration
  • risk
  • risk reduction
  • shift worker
  • silicon dioxide
  • skin
  • soft tissue sarcoma
  • solar radiation
  • stomach cancer
  • tetrachloroethylene
  • tobacco smoke
  • welding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The British occupational cancer burden study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this