The canonization of Christopher Shinn: A modest proposal on ethics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article represents the first sustained critique of the work of contemporary American dramatist, Christopher Shinn. Beginning with an anecdote about the exclusion of one of Shinn's plays from a prospective new play anthology, apparently because he is not yet 'canonical' enough, the article begs questions about how dramatic canons are constituted and policed. Through an analysis of three selected plays-Where Do We Live (2002).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-355
Number of pages26
JournalModern Drama
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • 9/11
  • Alain Badiou
  • canonical drama
  • Christopher Shinn
  • David Mamet
  • political theatre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The canonization of Christopher Shinn: A modest proposal on ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this