The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being

David Hulme, John Toye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Arguments for cross-disciplinary research in development studies have been applied recently to work on poverty, inequality and well-being. However, much research on these issues remains fragmented and, in particular, the intellectual barrier between economics and the other social science subjects continues to be powerful. In this paper, we review the prospects for cross-disciplinary research (both multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary); and, examine the ways in which forms of being 'disciplined', and the linkages between disciplines and professions, constrains such research. We also introduce the papers in this collection and explain their relationship to the quest for cross-disciplinary research on poverty issues. Our conclusion is that cross-discipline working should be promoted and that both interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches can benefit research on poverty and well-being, provided that their specific merits and demerits are evaluated in relation to the research task in hand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1085-1107
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Development Studies
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this