The case for the nonideal morality of war: beyond revisionism vs. traditionalism in just war theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent discussions in Just War Theory have been framed by a polarising debate between “traditionalist” and “revisionist” approaches. This debate has largely overlooked the importance of an applied account of Just War Theory. The main aim of this essay is to defend the importance of this applied account and, in particular, a nonideal account of the ethics of war. I argue that the applied, nonideal morality of war is vital for a plausible and comprehensive account of Just War Theory. A subsidiary aim of the essay is to show that once we appreciate the importance of the applied, nonideal account, it becomes clear that the positions proposed by revisionists and traditionalists are, in fact, much closer than often presumed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-268
Number of pages27
JournalPolitical Theory
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date25 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Applied ethics
  • Just war
  • Nonideal theory
  • Revisionism
  • Traditionalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The case for the nonideal morality of war: beyond revisionism vs. traditionalism in just war theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this