The Charity-Mongers of Modern Babylon: Bureaucracy, Scandal, and the Transformation of the Philanthropic Marketplace, c.1870–1912

Sarah Roddy, Julie-Marie Strange, Bertrand Taithe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This essay sheds new light on the supposedly familiar world of Victorian philanthropy by considering charity in relation to market regulation. Focusing on the “charity fraud,” we suggest that in the shaping of this exclusive and paradoxical marketplace, charities eagerly seized fraud denunciations to advertise and authenticate their legitimacy. This reflected the massive changes in the charitable world since the days of paternalist social relations and, paradoxically, illustrates the extremity of the problem facing the donating public: if one could not be entirely certain of a local charity, how could he or she discern between the national organizations that undertook fund-raising for international disasters? This contest for legitimacy and the exposure of fraud shaped a contested but oddly virtuous exchange market: by the turn of the twentieth century, charities not only published account sheets but debated them publicly, too.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberJBR:9518880
Pages (from-to)118-137
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of British Studies
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Keywords

  • charity fraud marketplace bureaucracy scandal philanthropy victorian

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Charity-Mongers of Modern Babylon: Bureaucracy, Scandal, and the Transformation of the Philanthropic Marketplace, c.1870–1912'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this