Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: Systematic reviews, registry database analyses and economic evaluation

  • C. Robertson
  • , S.K. Arcot Ragupathy
  • , C. Boachie
  • , J.M. Dixon
  • , C. Fraser
  • , R. Hernández
  • , S. Heys
  • , W. Jack
  • , G. Kerr
  • , G. Lawrence
  • , G. MacLennan
  • , A. Maxwell
  • , J. McGregor
  • , G. Mowatt
  • , S. Pinder
  • , L. Ternent
  • , R. Thomas
  • , L. Vale
  • , R. Wilson
  • , S. Zhu
  • F. Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Review finds that surveillance following treatment of primary breast cancer is likely to improve patient survival, with a strategy of mammography alone every 12–24 months appearing to have the highest net benefits. To optimise the use of resources and achieve maximum patient benefit, women at a higher risk of developing ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence or metachronous contralateral breast cancer should be offered more comprehensive and more frequent surveillance
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)34
JournalHealth Technol Assess
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this