The clock is ticking—Or is it? Customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter

Delphine Caruelle, Line Lervik-olsen, Anders Gustafsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Customer waits are commonplace in retail settings. To develop efficient wait management strategies, retailers need insights into how customers respond to waiting during service encounters. An intuitive insight supported by extensive research is that a longer wait duration decreases customer satisfaction. However, the same wait duration might have different effects on customers depending on whether it is shorter or longer than what customers expected. To address this question, we draw upon the research on time value and predict asymmetry in the customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter versus longer than expected: Though the clock is often said to be ticking, waiting longer than expected leads to a minor decrease in satisfaction, whereas waiting shorter than expected substantially increases satisfaction. We provide evidence for this asymmetric effect across three studies and identify two boundary conditions: if the source of the expectation is external (e.g., wait time estimate provided by the retailer) or if the wait is much longer than expected. Overall, our research encourages retailers to put the customer response to waiting into perspective: Customers will tolerate waiting longer than expected, up to a certain point.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-264
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Retailing
Volume99
Issue number2
Early online date28 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Customer experience
  • Managing customer wait
  • Service encounters
  • Time value
  • Wait time estimate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The clock is ticking—Or is it? Customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this