Abstract
In the criteria used for assessment of response to treatment for advanced breast cancer the definition of no change (NC) is clear; however, there is no indication of the duration of stabilization required for patients to qualify for this category of response. We have made the assumption that NC is a worthwhile category of response if the overall time to progression (TTP) and survival of this group is not significantly different from patients with partial remissions (PR). Two hundred and sixty-three evaluable patients treated with endocrine therapy and 302 evaluable chemotherapy-treated patients were studied and the TTP and survival curves for PR and periods of NC from 1 to 6 months compared. For the endocrine-treated patients the TTP and survival curves for NC became non-significantly different from the PR curves after 4 and 5 months respectively. For chemotherapy-treated patients the TTP curves became non-significantly different from PR at 4 months and for survival the period was 3 months. In order to define NC as a useful category of response and to eliminate the possibility that NC taken for a shorter period could simply represent a slowly progressive tumour, we suggest that the minimum period of disease stabilization be taken as 5 months for both endocrine- and chemotherapy-treated patients.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1567-1572 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 10 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 1988 |
Keywords
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Breast Neoplasms
- Female
- Humans
- Ovariectomy
- Prognosis
- Tamoxifen
- Time Factors
- Journal Article