The detection of increments and decrements is not facilitated by abrupt onsets or offsets

Christopher J. Plack, Frederick J. Gallun, Ervin R. Hafter, Andrew Raimond

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Two experiments measured thresholds for the detection of increments and decrements in the intensity of a quasi-continuous broadband-noise (experiment 1) or increments in a 477-Hz pure-tone pedestal (experiment 2). A variety of onset and offset ramps for the intensity change were tested, from instantaneous onsets or offsets to ramps lasting several tens of milliseconds. For increments and decrements with equal duration, the characteristics of the ramps had little effect on performance. Abrupt rise times, which are associated with strong transient responses in auditory neurons, did not facilitate detection in comparison to much slower rise times. The temporal window model of temporal resolution provided a good account of the data when the decision statistic was the maximum magnitude of the change in the output of the window produced by the increment or decrement, but provided a poor account of the data when the decision statistic was the maximum rate of change in the output of the window over time. Overall the results suggest that, in the absence of cues in the audio-frequency domain, rapid changes in envelope contribute little to near-threshold increment or decrement detection. © 2006 Acoustical Society of America.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3950-3959
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
    Volume119
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

    Keywords

    • Adolescent
    • Adult
    • Analysis of Variance
    • physiology: Auditory Threshold
    • Cues
    • Female
    • Humans
    • physiology: Loudness Perception
    • Male
    • Models, Biological
    • Multivariate Analysis
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Time Factors

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The detection of increments and decrements is not facilitated by abrupt onsets or offsets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this