The diagnostic accuracies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practice: the results of the MAGIC (Manchester Airways Group Identifying COPD) study

Timothy Frank, Timothy L. Frank, Michelle L. Hazell, Mary F. Linehan, Peter I. Frank

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Although it is generally accepted that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed, there is little objective information concerning the size of the problem in the UK. Method: Patients from two general practices were offered spirometry if they were aged 30 or older, had reported ever smoking in one of four postal respiratory surveys (1993-2001), and/or reported four or more symptoms or risk factors in 2001 indicating likely obstructive airways disease. Results: Of 2646 subjects invited, 871 attended and 825 had adequate spirometry results for analysis. In all, 163 patients had spirometrically-confirmed COPD; 103 of these (63.2%) had no recorded COPD in their practice records, including 14 out of 31 (45.2%) whose spirometry results classified them as having severe or very severe COPD. Conclusion: This study found a considerable under-recording of COPD in two general practices. This may be due to a combination of administrative and diagnostic problems (including the under-use of spirometers), and a reluctance of patients to present with their symptoms. These results have important implications in terms of unmet need and resource utilisation. © 2006 General Practice Airways Group.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)286-293
    Number of pages7
    JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
    Volume15
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

    Keywords

    • Adults
    • COPD
    • Diagnosis
    • General practice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The diagnostic accuracies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practice: the results of the MAGIC (Manchester Airways Group Identifying COPD) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this