Projects per year
Abstract
Aims: To review existing evidence on effectiveness of community-based diversion programmes for Class A drug-using offenders.
Methods: 31 databases were searched for studies published 1985-2012 (update search 2012-2016) involving community-based Criminal Justice System diversion of Class A drug users via voluntary or court-mandated treatment.
Findings: 16 studies were initially included (US, 10; UK, 4; Canada, 1; Australia, 1). There was evidence for a small impact of diversion to treatment on drug use reduction (primary Class A drug use: OR 1.68, CI 1.12-2.53; other drug use: OR 2.60, 1.70-3.98). Class A drug users were less likely to complete treatment (OR 0.90, 0.87-0.94) than users of other drugs. There was uncertainty surrounding results for offending, which were not pooled due to lack of outcome measure comparability and heterogeneity. Individual studies pointed to a minor effect of diversion on offending. Findings remained unchanged following an update review (evidence up to March 2016: US, 3; Australia, 1).
Conclusions: Treatment accessed via community-based diversion is effective at reducing drug use in Class A drug-using offenders. Evidence of a reduction in offending amongst this group as a result of diversion is uncertain. Poor methodological quality and data largely limited to US methamphetamine users limits available evidence.
Methods: 31 databases were searched for studies published 1985-2012 (update search 2012-2016) involving community-based Criminal Justice System diversion of Class A drug users via voluntary or court-mandated treatment.
Findings: 16 studies were initially included (US, 10; UK, 4; Canada, 1; Australia, 1). There was evidence for a small impact of diversion to treatment on drug use reduction (primary Class A drug use: OR 1.68, CI 1.12-2.53; other drug use: OR 2.60, 1.70-3.98). Class A drug users were less likely to complete treatment (OR 0.90, 0.87-0.94) than users of other drugs. There was uncertainty surrounding results for offending, which were not pooled due to lack of outcome measure comparability and heterogeneity. Individual studies pointed to a minor effect of diversion on offending. Findings remained unchanged following an update review (evidence up to March 2016: US, 3; Australia, 1).
Conclusions: Treatment accessed via community-based diversion is effective at reducing drug use in Class A drug-using offenders. Evidence of a reduction in offending amongst this group as a result of diversion is uncertain. Poor methodological quality and data largely limited to US methamphetamine users limits available evidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-124 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 16 Nov 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- crime
- diversion
- offenders
- substance abuse
- systematic review
- treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of diversion programmes for offenders using Class A drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Insights on the National History of Problem Drug User (PDU) Offending.
Millar, T. (PI), Dunn, G. (CoI), Hayhurst, K. (CoI), Keane, J. (CoI), Pierce, M. (CoI) & Seddon, T. (CoI)
1/01/13 → 28/02/14
Project: Research
Research output
- 1 Commissioned report
-
The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Diversion and Aftercare Programmes for Offenders using Class A Drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation
Hayhurst, K., Leitner, M., Davies, L., Flentje, R., Millar, T., Jones, A., King, C., Donmall, M., Farrell, M., Fazel, S., Harris, R., Hickman, M., Lennox, C., Mayet, S., Senior, J. & Shaw, J., Jan 2015, 6 ed. Health Technology Assessment. 168 p. (Health Technology Assessment; vol. 19, no. 6)Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report › peer-review
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver