The Effects of Heterogeneity in the Comparative Effectiveness of Individual Treatments in Randomised Trials

Paraskevi Pericleous, Tjeerd Van Staa, Matthew Sperrin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

© 2017 European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) and IOS Press. In some randomised trials, the new treatment can be compared with usual care which can include multiple treatments and result in a heterogeneous control group. In this paper, we use simulation to assess the performance of various statistical methods to infer the individual effects of the various control treatments. These methods include inverse Probability Weighting, Doubly Robust Inverse Probability Weighting, Propensity Score, Disease Risk Score, Standardization and Multivariable Logistic Regression. Different scenarios were tested including unmeasured heterogeneity with or without confounding. The methods perform well when heterogeneity and confounding are both fully captured; however, for the scenarios where heterogeneity is not fully captured this leads to biased effect estimates, particularly where there is also unobserved confounding. Thus, leading to potentially misleading comparative effectiveness of individual treatments.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInformatics for Health
Subtitle of host publicationConnected Citizen-Led Wellness and Population Health
EditorsRebecca Randell, Ronald Cornet, Colin McCowan, Niels Peek, Phillip J. Scott
PublisherIOS Press
Pages221-225
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)9781614997528
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume235

Keywords

  • Heterogeneity
  • confounding
  • trials
  • unobserved

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effects of Heterogeneity in the Comparative Effectiveness of Individual Treatments in Randomised Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this