The effects of negative affectivity on self-reported activity limitations in stroke patients: Testing the Symptom Perception, Disability and Psychosomatic Hypotheses

Rachael Powell, Marie Johnston, Derek W. Johnston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigated whether Negative Affectivity (NA) causes bias in self-report measures of activity limitations or whether NA has a real, non-artifactual association with activity limitations. The Symptom Perception Hypothesis (NA negatively biases self-reporting), Disability Hypothesis (activity limitations cause NA) and Psychosomatic Hypothesis (NA causes activity limitations) were examined longitudinally using both self-report and objective activity limitations measures. Participants were 101 stroke patients and their caregivers interviewed within two weeks of discharge, six weeks later and six months post-discharge. NA and self-report, proxy-report and observed performance activity (walking) limitations were assessed at each interview. NA was associated with activity limitations across measures. Both the Disability and Psychosomatic Hypotheses were supported: initial NA predicted objective activity limitations at six weeks but, additionally, activity limitations at six weeks predicted NA at six months. These results suggest that NA both affects and is affected by activity limitations and does not simply influence reporting.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-206
    Number of pages11
    JournalPsychology and Health
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

    Keywords

    • Activity limitations
    • Disability
    • Measurement
    • Negative affectivity
    • Self-report
    • Self-report bias

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of negative affectivity on self-reported activity limitations in stroke patients: Testing the Symptom Perception, Disability and Psychosomatic Hypotheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this