Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Hypofractionated High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in an Elderly Population: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHHiP Trial

  • James M. Wilson
  • , David P. Dearnaley*
  • , Isabel Syndikus
  • , Vincent Khoo
  • , Alison Birtle
  • , David Bloomfield
  • , Ananya Choudhury
  • , John Graham
  • , Catherine Ferguson
  • , Zafar Malik
  • , Julian Money-Kyrle
  • , Joe M. O'Sullivan
  • , Miguel Panades
  • , Chris Parker
  • , Yvonne Rimmer
  • , Christopher Scrase
  • , John Staffurth
  • , Andrew Stockdale
  • , Clare Cruickshank
  • , Clare Griffin
  • Emma Hall, CHHiP Investigators
*Corresponding author for this work
  • St Thomas' Hospital
  • The Institute of Cancer Research (University of London)
  • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
  • Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Musgrove Park Hospital
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Royal Surrey County Hospital
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Lincoln County Hospital
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust
  • University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire
  • Velindre Cancer Centre
  • Cardiff University
  • Rosemere Cancer Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Outcome data on radiation therapy for prostate cancer in an elderly population are sparse. The CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer) trial provides a large, prospectively collected, contemporary dataset in which to explore outcomes by age. Methods and Materials: CHHiP participants received 3 to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 74 Gy in 37 fractions (conventional fractionation), 60 Gy in 20 fractions, or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Toxicity was assessed using clinician-reported outcome (CRO) and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Participants were categorized as aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years. Outcomes were compared by age group. Results: Of 3216 patients, 491 (15%) were aged ≥ 75 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure rates between the groups aged < 75 years and ≥ 75 years for any of the fractionation schedules. In the group aged ≥ 75 years, biochemical or clinical failure–free rates favored hypofractionation, and at 5 years, they were 84.7% for 74 Gy, 91% for 60 Gy, and 87.7% for 57 Gy. The incidence of CRO (grade 3) acute bowel toxicity was 2% in both age groups. The incidence of grade 3 acute bladder toxicity was 8% in patients aged < 75 years and 7% in those aged ≥ 75 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CRO grade ≥ 2 late bowel side effects was similar in both age groups. However, in the group aged ≥ 75 years, there was a suggestion of a higher cumulative incidence of bowel bother (small or greater) with 60 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 57 Gy. Patient-reported bladder bother was slightly higher in the group aged ≥ 75 years than the group aged < 75 years, and there was a suggestion of a lower cumulative incidence of bladder bother with 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 60 Gy in patients aged ≥ 75 years, which was not evident in those aged < 75 years. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiation therapy appears to be well tolerated and effective in men aged ≥ 75 years. The 57-Gy schedule has potential advantages in that it may moderate long-term side effects without compromising treatment efficacy in this group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1179-1189
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume100
Issue number5
Early online date9 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Hypofractionated High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in an Elderly Population: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHHiP Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this