The end of the unique myocardial band: Part II. Clinical and functional considerations

David H. MacIver*, John B. Partridge, Peter Agger, Robert S. Stephenson, Bastiaan J.D. Boukens, Camilla Omann, Jonathan C. Jarvis, Henggui Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Two of the leading concepts of mural ventricular architecture are the unique myocardial band and the myocardial mesh model. We have described, in an accompanying article published in this journal, how the anatomical, histological and high-resolution computed tomographic studies strongly favour the latter concept. We now extend the argument to describe the linkage between mural architecture and ventricular function in both health and disease. We show that clinical imaging by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiological studies, all support the myocardial mesh model. We also provide evidence that the unique myocardial band model is not compatible with much of scientific research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)120-128
    Number of pages9
    JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
    Volume53
    Issue number1
    Early online date25 Sept 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Keywords

    • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    • Contractile stress
    • Diastolic function
    • Echocardiography
    • Electrophysiology
    • Helical heart
    • Helical ventricular myocardial band
    • Ventricular anatomy
    • Ventricular function

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The end of the unique myocardial band: Part II. Clinical and functional considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this