Abstract
While often caused by conflict, crises are treated by the EU as a phenomenon of their own. Contemporary EU crisis management represents a watering down of normative EU approaches to peacebuilding, reduced to a technical exercise with the limited ambition to contain spillover effects of crises. In theoretical terms this is a reversal, which tilts intervention towards EU security interests and avoids engagement with the root causes of the crises. This paper develops a novel crisis response typology derived from conflict theory, which ranges from crisis management to crisis resolution and (critical) crisis transformation. By drawing on EU interventions in Libya, Mali and Ukraine, the paper demonstrates that basic crisis management approaches are pre-eminent in practice. More promising innovations remain largely confined to the realms of discourse and policy documentation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 85-106 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Conflict, Security & Development |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Jan 2021 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute