The Evolution of Mass Atrocity Early Warning in the UN Secretariat: Fit for Purpose?

Stephen McLoughlin, Jess Gifkins, Alex Bellamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


A lack of early warning by the United Nations Secretariat of the Rwandan genocide contributed, in part, to the failure of the international community to respond in a timely manner to this crisis. In the intervening decades, alongside the strengthening of the norm of civilian protection, the UN has enhanced its capacity for early warning through greater personnel numbers, as well as the refining of risk analysis through the development of frameworks of analysis for atrocity crimes. However, to date, there has been no systematic study of the evolution and practice of mass atrocity early warning within the United Nations Secretariat, and the impact this has had on UN-led responses to impending and unfolding cases of mass atrocity crimes. In this article, we analyse the evolution of early warning within the UN Secretariat and how the Secretariat responded (or failed to respond) to escalating violence in Rwanda, Darfur, Côte d’Ivoire and Ethiopia. This analysis finds that despite incremental improvements in mass atrocity early warning in the UN Secretariat (which contributed to more timely responses in Côte d’Ivoire), more recent cases demonstrate that failure is no longer due to lack of early warning, but a result of lack of political will.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Peacekeeping
Early online date24 Jul 2023
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jul 2023


  • Early warning
  • UN Secretariat
  • United Nations
  • mass atrocities
  • prevention


Dive into the research topics of 'The Evolution of Mass Atrocity Early Warning in the UN Secretariat: Fit for Purpose?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this