TY - JOUR
T1 - The evolution of the Chinese IPR system: IPR laws revisions and enforcement
AU - Hong, Jie
AU - Edler, Jakob
AU - Massini, Silvia
PY - 2021/10/6
Y1 - 2021/10/6
N2 - Since the first Trademark Law was enacted in China in 1982, the Chinese IPR system has undergone significant changes in both the design of the legislation and its enforcement. In this paper, we analyse the evolution of IPR legislation and enforcement in China. To this end, we introduce the evolutionary changes of the Chinese IPR system, and analyse the changes introduced in four revisions (1992–1993, 2000–2001, 2008–2013, and 2019-2020). Our analysis shows that Patent Law, Trademark Law, and Copyright Law have been substantially enhanced, especially since 2000, when China improved its IPR system to comply with the TRIPS Agreement and join the WTO, and especially the most recent amendments of these three IP Laws. We discuss the number of IPR infringement cases handled by both relevant administrative authorities and courts to analyse the IPR enforcement in China. The results indicate that the development of IPR protection enforcement followed the improvement of relevant IPR laws. The two revisions introduced after 2008, the changes in the Chinese IPR system, and the increasing number of IPR infringement cases handled by relevant authorities also suggest willingness of the Chinese government to further enhance its IPR protection.
AB - Since the first Trademark Law was enacted in China in 1982, the Chinese IPR system has undergone significant changes in both the design of the legislation and its enforcement. In this paper, we analyse the evolution of IPR legislation and enforcement in China. To this end, we introduce the evolutionary changes of the Chinese IPR system, and analyse the changes introduced in four revisions (1992–1993, 2000–2001, 2008–2013, and 2019-2020). Our analysis shows that Patent Law, Trademark Law, and Copyright Law have been substantially enhanced, especially since 2000, when China improved its IPR system to comply with the TRIPS Agreement and join the WTO, and especially the most recent amendments of these three IP Laws. We discuss the number of IPR infringement cases handled by both relevant administrative authorities and courts to analyse the IPR enforcement in China. The results indicate that the development of IPR protection enforcement followed the improvement of relevant IPR laws. The two revisions introduced after 2008, the changes in the Chinese IPR system, and the increasing number of IPR infringement cases handled by relevant authorities also suggest willingness of the Chinese government to further enhance its IPR protection.
M3 - Article
JO - Management and Organization Review
JF - Management and Organization Review
SN - 1740-8776
ER -