The future is risky: Discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes

Marianna Blackburn, Wael El-Deredy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The world is full of choices where outcomes are both delayed and probabilistic. Whilst the delay discounting framework provides a platform for examining the relationship between dimensions of time and probability, the majority of research has considered these factors in isolation, or made assumptions about their equivalence. In order to address these issues, we present a novel measurement approach for assessing the discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes. We conducted two experiments which compared discounting on three types of delay discounting task (standard, uncertain outcome, and uncertain amount) and examined the robustness of using a delayed and uncertain outcome's certainty equivalent relative to its expected value as a method for measuring discount rates. Both experiments demonstrated that discounting is best modelled by a hyperbolic function that describes subjective values relative to their certain equivalents. Moreover, when modelled this way, clear differences emerged between the different aspects of uncertainty (outcome vs. amount) dependent on whether outcomes were delayed gains or losses. This was true for both group and individual delay discounting data, as well as for both outcomes that were uncertain with respect to whether they would occur or not and outcomes that were uncertain with respect to what their magnitude would be when they occurred. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)9-18
    Number of pages9
    JournalBehavioural Processes
    Volume94
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

    Keywords

    • Certainty equivalent
    • Delay discounting
    • Subjective value
    • Uncertainty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The future is risky: Discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this