Abstract
While it is now widely recognized that a general factor (GFP) can be extracted from most personality data, this finding has been subject to numerous critiques: (1) that the GFP is an artefact due to socially desirable responding; (2) that it is factorially indeterminate; (3) that it can be more parsimoniously modelled using blended variables; (4) that it shows less genetic variance due to dominance than should be true of a fitness trait; (5) that it correlates more weakly with g than would be predicted from Life History theory; (6) that it cannot be recovered across personality inventories. We present new evidence and argument to show that each of these critiques is open to reasonable doubt. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 234-242 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
Volume | 55 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2013 |
Keywords
- Blended variables
- G
- General factor of personality, GFP
- Genetic dominance
- MTMM
- Personality structure