Abstract
This paper undertakes a re-examination of Sir William Hamilton's doctrine of the quantification of the predicate. Hamilton's doctrine comprises two theses. First, the predicates of traditional syllogistic sentence-forms contain implicit existential quantifiers, so that, for example, All p is q is to be understood as All p is some q. Second, these implicit quantifiers can be meaningfully dualized to yield novel sentence-forms, such as, for example, All p is all q. Hamilton attempted to provide a deductive system for his language, along the lines of the classical syllogisms. We show, using techniques unavailable to Hamilton, that such a system does exist, though with qualifications that distinguish it from its classical counterpart. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 445-474 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Journal of Logic, Language and Information |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2011 |
Keywords
- Complexity
- Natural language and logic
- Proof-theory
- Syllogisms