Abstract
Two decades in, whether we are making any progress towards solving, or even explaining away, what David Chalmers calls (1995) the ‘hard’ problem of consciousness is as controversial as ever. This paper aims to argue that there are, in actual fact, two explanatory targets associated with the hard problem. Moreover, this in turn has repercussions for how we assess the explanatory merits of any proposed solution to the problem. The paper ends with a brief exposition of how the present distinction goes beyond similar ones already made by respondents to Joseph Levine's (1983) explanatory gap.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 298-311 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Ratio |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Jul 2016 |