Abstract
We investigate the distributional consequences of two different waiting times initiatives, one in Norway, and one in Scotland. The primary focus of Scotland's recent waiting time reforms, introduced in 2003, and modified in 2005 and 2007, has been on reducing maximum waiting times through the imposition of high profile national targets accompanied by increases in resources. In Norway, the focus of the reform introduced in September 2004, has been on assigning patients referred to hospital a maximum waiting time based on disease severity, the expected benefit and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment. We use large, national administrative datasets from before and after each of these reforms and assign priority groups based on the maximum waiting times stipulated in medical guidelines. The analysis shows that the lowest priority patients benefited most from both reforms. This was at the cost of longer waiting times for patients that should have been given higher priority in Norway, while Scotland's high priority patients remained unaffected. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
Volume | 97 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Norway
- Prioritisation
- Scotland
- Waiting times