The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: A meta-analysis.

Michael Wigelsworth, Ann Lendrum, J. Oldfield, Adam Scott, I. Ten-Bokkel, K. Tate, Carl Emery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study expands upon the extant prior meta-analytic literature by exploring previously theorised reasons for the failure of school-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) programmes to produce expected results. Eighty-nine studies reporting the effects of school-based, universal SEL programmes were examined for differential effects on the basis of: (1) stage of evaluation (efficacy or effectiveness); (2) involvement from the programme developer in the evaluation (led, involved, independent); and (3) whether the programme was implemented in its country of origin (home or away). A range of outcomes were assessed including: social-emotional competence, attitudes towards self, pro-social behaviour, conduct problems, emotional distress, academic achievement and emotional competence. Differential gains across all three factors were shown, although not always in the direction hypothesised. The findings from the current study demonstrate a revised and more complex relationship between identified factors and dictate major new directions for the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 347-376
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: A meta-analysis.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this