The influence of socioeconomic and clinical factors upon the presenting visual field status of patients with glaucoma

S. Sukumar, F. Spencer, C. Fenerty, R. Harper, D. Henson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    88 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose To investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status and the extent of visual field loss in POAG and treated OHT patients at their first presentation to Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. Methods A cohort of 113 glaucoma patients seen between 1995 and 2005 was reviewed. The clinical parameters intraocular pressure, C: D ratio, family history of glaucoma, visual acuity, extent of visual field loss, and demographic parameters: age, gender, ethnicity, and residential postcode were extracted from hospital records. The socioeconomic status of each patient was estimated from the patient's residential postcode with the ACORN index (group 1: affluent and group 2: socioeconomically deprived). Results In comparison to group 1 (n49), patients in group 2 (n64) presented with more advanced field loss, lower educational attainment (18 vs 98% with no or unknown qualification), and were less aware of glaucoma in the family (27 vs 17%). Patients with a number of systemic health problems had worse vision, more severe visual field loss, and worse clinical attendance (P <0.05). Conclusions The extent of visual field loss in glaucoma patients at first presentation is related to a combination of clinical and socioeconomic factors including the patient's postcode. This finding could be used to target future case-finding resources. © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1038-1044
    Number of pages6
    JournalEye
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2009

    Keywords

    • Glaucoma
    • Risk factors
    • Socioeconomic
    • Visual field loss

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of socioeconomic and clinical factors upon the presenting visual field status of patients with glaucoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this