The International Core Literature Consensus (ICLC): an alternative curriculum for Oncologists.

  • Shilpen Patel
  • , Reshma Jagsi
  • , Natalie Cook
  • , Luke Hughes-Davies
  • , Christine Parkinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Oncologists must familiarize themselves with a complex evidence base. Several curricula have been devised, but it is not clear how these are used. We chose breast cancer, since this has a large literature base. Of the 285 radiation and medical oncology trainees in the USA and UK responding to our survey, over 90% reported knowledge of the literature was essential. Just over half of respondents had actually read the ASCO or ESMO curricula, with only 23% reporting that the curricula were important in their learning. Our survey revealed dissatisfaction with current curricula and a demand for more pragmatic literature guidance. We designed an alternative curriculum by using a 21-member peer review group to validate a list of key papers in breast oncology. Oncologists in training need guidance to direct their study. A curriculum based on an International Core Literature Consensus might match the needs of trainees more closely.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Cancer Education
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The International Core Literature Consensus (ICLC): an alternative curriculum for Oncologists.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this