The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37207 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The multi-level perspective (MLP) has emerged as a fruitful middle-range framework for analysing socio-technical transitions to sustainability. The MLP also received constructive criticisms. This paper summarises seven criticisms, formulates responses to them, and translates these into suggestions for future research. The criticisms relate to: (1) lack of agency, (2) operationalization of regimes, (3) bias towards bottom-up change models, (4) epistemology and explanatory style, (5) methodology, (6) socio-technical landscape as residual category, and (7) flat ontologies versus hierarchical levels. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-40
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Keywords

  • Multi-level perspective
  • Response to critics
  • Sustainable development
  • Transitions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this