The obesity paradox in cancer: a review

Hannah Lennon, Matthew Sperrin, Ellena Badrick, Andrew Renehan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    There is a common perception that excess adiposity, commonly approximated by body mass index (BMI), is associated with reduced cancer survival. A number of studies have emerged challenging this by demonstrating that overweight and early obese states are associated with improved survival. This finding is termed the “obesity paradox” and is well recognized in the cardio-metabolic literature but less so in oncology. Here, we summarize the epidemiological findings related to the obesity paradox in cancer. Our review highlights that many observations of the obesity paradox in cancer reflect methodological mechanisms including the crudeness of BMI as an obesity measure, confounding, detection bias, reverse causality, and a specific form of the selection bias, known as collider bias. It is imperative for the oncologist to interpret the observation of the obesity paradox against the above methodological framework and avoid the misinterpretation that being obese might be “good” or “protective” for cancer patients.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCurrent Oncology Reports
    Volume18
    Issue number56
    Early online date30 Jul 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The obesity paradox in cancer: a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this