Abstract
The research was carried out on the upper permanent incisor teeth of 101 children aged 8-12 years attending the trauma clinic at the University Dental Hospital, Manchester, UK. The double blind, cross-over study involved Periotest readings being taken by one examiner and traditional special tests being carried out by another examiner. The traditional special tests chosen were mobility testing, percussion sounds and radiographs. The Periotest readings and special tests were then repeated at the child's recall appointment. The results revealed that there was a significant difference (P <0.001) between the number of abnormalities detected by the Periotest and those detected by the traditional special tests. There was also found to be a significant difference (P <0.001) in the detection of undesirable sequelae between the Periotest and the traditional special tests.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 218-220 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Dental Traumatology |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2003 |
Keywords
- Dental injury
- Diagnosis
- Periodontal healing
- Periotest
- Tooth mobility