The persistence of social strategies under increasing competitive pressure

Michael Kopel*, Fabio Lamantia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we study the long run outcome if firms are repeatedly matched to play a N-firm Cournot oligopoly game and can select their type of business objective. Firms can either be profit-maximizing or socially concerned, also pursuing consumer welfare. We use an indirect evolutionary approach to distinguish between the endogenous, profit-maximizing choice of the firms’ business objectives and their corresponding market behavior. Our main result is that the prospects of long run survival of firms pursuing social strategies strongly depends on the number of firms in the industry. If a social strategy entails higher marginal production costs, it is best suited if the number of firms in the industry is not too large. In particular, we demonstrate that the relation between long survival and the level of competitiveness of the industry is inverse U-shaped. We confirm this result by using the concept of coalition stability and further show that if a high number of firms adopt a social strategy, welfare might be lower than with just profit-maximizing firms.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Early online date22 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Coalition stability
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Evolutionary dynamics
  • Influence of competition
  • Mixed oligopoly markets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The persistence of social strategies under increasing competitive pressure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this