The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships

Jonathan Hammond*, Simon Bailey, O. Z. Gore, Kath Checkland*, Sarah Darley*, Ruth McDonald, Thomas Blakeman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Public-Private Innovation Partnerships (PPIPs) are increasingly used as a tool for addressing 'wicked' public sector challenges. 'Innovation' is, however, frequently treated as a 'magic' concept: used unreflexively, taken to be axiomatically 'good', and left undefined within policy programmes. Using McConnell's framework of policy success and failure and a case study of a multi-level PPIP in the English health service (NHS Test Beds), this paper critically explores the implications of the mobilisation of innovation in PPIP policy and practice. We highlight how the interplay between levels (macro/micro and policy maker/recipient) can shape both emerging policies and their prospects for success or failure. The paper contributes to an understanding of PPIP success and failure by extending McConnell's framework to explore inter-level effects between policy and innovation project, and demonstrating how the success of PPIP policy cannot be understood without recognising the particular political effects of 'innovation' on formulation and implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)771-791
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • innovation
  • policy experimentation
  • policy success
  • public-private partnerships

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this