The process of recovery from bipolar i disorder: A qualitative analysis of personal accounts in relation to an integrative cognitive model

Warren Mansell, Nia Coupe, Seth Powell, Rebecca Pedley, Nia Thomas, Sarah Amelia Jones

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objectives. This study explored the process of recovery from bipolar I disorder from a phenomenological and cognitive perspective. Design. A semi-structured interview was coded and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Methods. Eleven individuals over the age of 30 with a history of bipolar disorder were selected on the basis of having remained free from relapse, and without hospitalization for at least 2 years, as confirmed by a diagnostic interview (Standardised Interview for DSM-IV; SCID-I). This arbitrary and equivocal criterion for 'recovery' provided an objective method of defining the sample for the study. Results. The analysis revealed two overarching themes formed from four themes each. Ambivalent approaches referred to approaches that participants felt had both positive and negative consequences: avoidance of mania, taking medication, prior illness versus current wellness, and sense of identity following diagnosis. Helpful approaches referred to approaches that were seen as universally helpful: understanding, life-style fundamentals, social support and companionship, and social change. Conclusions. These themes were then interpreted in the light of the existing literature and an integrative cognitive model of bipolar disorder. Limitations and future research directions are discussed. © 2010 The British Psychological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)193-215
    Number of pages22
    JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
    Volume49
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The process of recovery from bipolar i disorder: A qualitative analysis of personal accounts in relation to an integrative cognitive model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this