The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To assess the quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices, to determine the relative frequency of errors and to identify those errors directly responsible for diagnostically inadequate images. Materials and methods: Examination of 1,813 panoramic radiographs obtained from 41 general dental practitioners and recording of faults. The study was carried out in 1998. Radiographs were judged as being 'excellent', 'diagnostically acceptable' or 'unacceptable'. Results: Only 0.8% of films were 'excellent', 66.2% were 'diagnostically acceptable' and 33% were 'unacceptable'. The most common faults which directly contributed to failure of the radiographs were antero-posterior positioning errors, low density and low contrast. Conclusions: The quality of panoramic radiographs was considerably lower than standards recently set for primary dental care. The quality of panoramic radiography could be improved by careful attention to radiographic technique and processing. © British Dental Journal 1999.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)630-633
    Number of pages3
    JournalBritish Dental Journal
    Volume186
    Issue number12
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Keywords

    • Adolescent
    • Adult
    • Analysis of Variance
    • Diagnostic Errors
    • England
    • General Practice, Dental
    • Humans
    • Quality of Health Care
    • standards: Radiography, Panoramic
    • Reproducibility of Results

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this