The relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic skill reflects the approximate number system, and cannot be explained by inhibitory control

Kelly Burgoyne, Stephanie Malone, Verena Pritchard, Michelle Heron-Delaney, Arne Lervag, Charles Hulme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Numerosity discrimination tasks (judging which of two random dot arrays contains the larger number) have been widely used as a measure of the efficiency of an approximate number system (ANS) and are a correlate of early arithmetic skills. Recently, it has been suggested that the relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic is explained by inhibition rather than the ANS. We assessed this hypothesis in a study of 496 children (mean age = 81.23 months) using numerosity discrimination tasks that manipulated the congruency between surface area and numerosity. Numerosity discrimination for incongruent arrays (which are postulated to require inhibition due to a conflict between judgments based on surface area rather than numerosity) was more difficult than that for congruent arrays. However, all numerosity discrimination tasks showed substantial correlations with each other and correlated with arithmetic. A latent variable path model showed that a general numerosity judgment factor correlated with arithmetic even after controlling for a measure of response inhibition. In contrast, numerosity discrimination for incongruent arrays showed no unique relationship with arithmetic ability. Our results do not support the view that the relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic is largely attributable to inhibition; rather, they are consistent with the view that numerosity discrimination tasks tap the operation of an ANS.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Early online date29 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic skill reflects the approximate number system, and cannot be explained by inhibitory control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this