Abstract
Six experiments examined human performance on a modified temporal generalization task when either 1 or 2 standard durations were encoded. In most conditions, participants were presented with a 1st standard duration (A), then judged whether a number of comparison stimuli had the same duration as A. They were then presented with a 2nd standard (B) and again judged whether other comparison stimuli had the same duration as B. Then, after a delay period of 0-45 s, further comparison stimuli were presented, and participants judged whether those stimuli had the same duration as A, without A being represented. A was either the same length as B or shorter or longer than it, so potential retroactive interference effects of B on A could be examined. After a short delay before retesting of A comparisons, the peak of the temporal generalization gradient shifted toward the shortest of the comparisons when A <B and the longest when A > B. The results suggest that certain combinations of delay and interference might render the memory of A unusable, so that a new standard is constructed on the basis of the remembered relationship between A and B, a kind of "false memory" for duration. © 2008 American Psychological Association.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1524-1544 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2008 |
Keywords
- interference
- reference
- reference memory
- temporal generalization
- timing