The risk of childhood cancer from low doses of ionising radiation received in utero

Richard Wakeford, Richard Doll, John F Bithell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Radiological protection is based upon the assumption that any additional exposure to ionising
radiation leads to an increased risk of stochastic adverse health effects. The validity of this
assumption is supported by the epidemiological association between childhood cancer and X-ray
exposure of the fetus in utero for diagnostic purposes. Evidence for a direct causal interpretation of
this association is compelling: the association has high statistical significance, it is consistent across
many case-control studies carried out worldwide, and an appropriate dose-response relationship is
indicated. Evidence against bias and confounding as alternative explanations is strong. Nonetheless,
objections to causality have been raised. Four grounds for controversy are examined in detail, with
the conclusion that they do not provide persuasive evidence against a cause and effect relationship.
We conclude that acute doses of the order of 10 mGy received by the fetus in utero cause a
subsequent increase in the risk of cancer in childhood, and that, in these circumstances, the excess
absolute risk coefficient for childhood cancer incidence is 6-12% per Gy
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLow doses of ionizing radiation
Subtitle of host publicationBiological effects and regulatory control.
PublisherInternational Atomic Energy Agency
Pages391-394
Number of pages4
Volume IAEA-TECDOC--976
Publication statusPublished - 1997
EventLow Doses of Ionizing Radiation: Biological Effects and Regulatory Control: IAEA-TECDOC-976 - Seville, Spain
Duration: 17 Nov 199721 Nov 1997
Conference number: IAEA-CN-67

Conference

ConferenceLow Doses of Ionizing Radiation: Biological Effects and Regulatory Control
Country/TerritorySpain
CitySeville
Period17/11/9721/11/97

Keywords

  • IAEA-TECDOC--976

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The risk of childhood cancer from low doses of ionising radiation received in utero'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this