TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of connective interventions in the collective management of public-bad problems: Evidence from a socio-ecological system perspective
AU - Galarza-Villamar, Julissa A.
AU - McCampbell, Mariette
AU - Agyekumhene, Christopher
AU - Asingizwe, Domina
AU - Attoh, Emmanuel M. N. A. N.
AU - Damtew, Elias
AU - Chepkwony, Richard
AU - Cieslik, Katarzyna
AU - Munthali, Nyamwaya
AU - Murindahabi, Marilyn M.
AU - Mutavi, Faith
AU - Nyamekye, Andy B
AU - Tafesse, Shiferaw
AU - Struik, Paul
AU - Leeuwis, Cees
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Managing public-bad problems is difficult and arriving at an effective collective response can be an even bigger challenge. Using a socio-ecological systems framework, we explore the role of communication-focused interventions in the management of public bads in six African case-studies. We analyse case-specific livelihood units, public-bad risk conditions, and threats, and the strategies to prevent and control a public bad. We assess the impact of connective interventions on existing risk governance systems and problem management. Our findings show that connective interventions enable people to define risk boundaries, learn about the costs and benefits of public-bad management, and develop capacity for collective decision-making and problem monitoring. However, connective interventions cannot work in isolation and require complementary strategies, and trust in broader governance and institutional arrangements. Our research demonstrates the value of the social ecological systems framework in synthesizing lessons and insights from diverse interdisciplinary studies.
AB - Managing public-bad problems is difficult and arriving at an effective collective response can be an even bigger challenge. Using a socio-ecological systems framework, we explore the role of communication-focused interventions in the management of public bads in six African case-studies. We analyse case-specific livelihood units, public-bad risk conditions, and threats, and the strategies to prevent and control a public bad. We assess the impact of connective interventions on existing risk governance systems and problem management. Our findings show that connective interventions enable people to define risk boundaries, learn about the costs and benefits of public-bad management, and develop capacity for collective decision-making and problem monitoring. However, connective interventions cannot work in isolation and require complementary strategies, and trust in broader governance and institutional arrangements. Our research demonstrates the value of the social ecological systems framework in synthesizing lessons and insights from diverse interdisciplinary studies.
KW - collective action
KW - complex problems
KW - disease
KW - interdisciplinary research
KW - livelihood
KW - public bads
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181213625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1b604a11-41c2-305c-8c94-0d0bf6e77470/
U2 - 10.1080/27685241.2023.2293846
DO - 10.1080/27685241.2023.2293846
M3 - Article
SN - 2768-5241
VL - 96
JO - NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences
JF - NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences
IS - 1
M1 - 2293846
ER -